Charles Swarzentruber v. C. Holinka
This text of 320 F. App'x 479 (Charles Swarzentruber v. C. Holinka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Federal inmate Charles Swarzentruber appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of *480 his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Upon careful de novo review, see Hill v. Momson, 849 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir.2003), we conclude that the district court’s decision was proper, see Miller v. Whitehead, 527 F.3d 752, 756-57 (8th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minne *480 sota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-swarzentruber-v-c-holinka-ca8-2009.