Charles Stevenson v. Lacell Tucker
This text of 235 F.2d 21 (Charles Stevenson v. Lacell Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
235 F.2d 21
Charles STEVENSON et al., Appellants,
v.
Lacell TUCKER et al., Appellees.
No. 13036.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 17, 1956.
Decided May 31, 1956.
Mr. George E. C. Hayes, Washington, D. C., for appellants. Mr. Everett L. Edmund, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellants.
Mr. George A. Parker, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Barrington D. Parker and Horace O. Pollard, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order vacating a writ of assistance, which writ was issued in aid of a default judgment. We find no abuse of discretion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 F.2d 21, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 262, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-stevenson-v-lacell-tucker-cadc-1956.