Charles Scruggs v. State
This text of Charles Scruggs v. State (Charles Scruggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED JULY SESSION, 1999 July 23, 1999
Cecil W. Crowson CHARLES SCRUGGS, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9903-CC-00079 ) Appe llant, ) ) ) WILLIAMSON COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. CORNELIA A. CLARK STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) JUDGE ) Appellee. ) (Post-Conviction)
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:
CHARLES SCRUGGS PAUL G. SUMMERS Pro Se Attorney General & Reporter CCA, P. O. Box 279 Clifton, TN 38425 CLINTON J. MORGAN Coun sel for the S tate 425 Fifth Avenu e North Nashville, TN 37243-0493
JOE D. BAUGH, JR. District Attorney General
RON DAV IS Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 937 Franklin, TN 37065-0937
ORDER FILED ________________________
AFFIRMED PURSU ANT TO RU LE 20
JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE ORDER
The appellant, Charles Scruggs, appeals the order of the Williamson
County Circuit Court denying his “Motion to Correct an Illegal Judgment and
Senten ce.” The appellant is presently serving a life sentence for the homicide of
Rosie Lee H unter co mm itted on Ja nuary 10 , 1982. H e claims that he was
illegally senten ced to a life sentence for second degree murder under the 1982
Sentencing Act. The trial court denied the appellant’s motion, finding that
because he was convicted of first degree felony murder, not second degree
murder, a senten ce of life imp risonm ent is prope r. W e affirm pursu ant to R ule
20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.
In 1982, the appellan t and two co-defendants were indicted for one (1)
count of prem editated first degree murder, one (1) count of first degree felony
murder in the perpetration of a robbery, and one (1) coun t of robbery
accomplished by the use of a deadly weapon. The jury found the appellant and
his co-defend ants gu ilty of felony m urder as alleged in Coun t Two o f the
indictme nt. Their convictions were affirmed by this Court on appeal. State v.
Charles Allen, Jr., E arl Haynes and Charles Scruggs, C.C.A. N o. 83-22 5-III,
Williams on Coun ty (Tenn. Crim . App. filed May 2, 19 85).
Because the state did n ot seek th e death penalty in th is case, a sentence
of life imp risonm ent wa s ma ndato ry upo n the ju ry’s verdict of guilt for first degree
felony murde r. See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-2402(b) (Supp. 1981), 39-2-202(b)
(1982). Ther efore, th e app ellant’s sentence is not illegal, and the trial cou rt
properly denied the motion to correct the judgment and sentence.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court be
affirmed pursuant to T ennesse e Court of Criminal Appeals Rule 20. Costs of the
-2- appeal will be paid by the State of Tennes see, as it appea rs that the appe llant is
indigent.
____________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE
CONCUR:
___________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, JUDGE
___________________________________ NORMA MCGEE OGLE, JUDGE
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Scruggs v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-scruggs-v-state-tenncrimapp-1999.