Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Winston

S.D. New York

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Winston

DecidedJanuary 23, 2025

Docket1:24-cv-10033

StatusUnknown

This text of Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Winston (Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Winston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Winston, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., Petitioner, 24 Civ. 10033 (PAE) ~ ORDER EDWARD BRIAN WINSTON, Respondent.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Petitioner has moved to confirm a February 20, 2024 arbitral award. Dkt. 6. Proceedings to confirm an arbitral award must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: e February 13, 2025: Petitioner’s memorandum of law in support of its petition due.

e March 6, 2025: Respondent’s opposition due. e March 13, 2025: Petitioner’s reply, if any, due. Petitioner is to serve this order, as well as its petition and papers in support, on respondent forthwith and file proof of this service, on the docket of this case, no later than January 30, 2025. SO ORDERED. Pan A. € vychons Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Dated: January 23, 2025 New York, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., Petitioner, 24 Civ. 10033 (PAE) ~ ORDER EDWARD BRIAN WINSTON, Respondent.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Petitioner has moved to confirm a February 20, 2024 arbitral award. Dkt. 6. Proceedings to confirm an arbitral award must be “treated as akin to a motion for summary judgment.” D.H Blair & Co. v. Gottdiener, 462 F.3d 95, 109 (2d Cir. 2006). Accordingly, the Court sets the following briefing schedule: e February 13, 2025: Petitioner’s memorandum of law in support of its petition due.

e March 6, 2025: Respondent’s opposition due. e March 13, 2025: Petitioner’s reply, if any, due. Petitioner is to serve this order, as well as its petition and papers in support, on respondent forthwith and file proof of this service, on the docket of this case, no later than January 30, 2025. SO ORDERED. Pan A. € vychons Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge Dated: January 23, 2025 New York, New York

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Winston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-schwab-co-inc-v-winston-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack