CHARLES SCARDINA v. RAMZI AKEL and CATERINA AKEL
This text of CHARLES SCARDINA v. RAMZI AKEL and CATERINA AKEL (CHARLES SCARDINA v. RAMZI AKEL and CATERINA AKEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
CHARLES SCARDINA, CHERYL SCARDINA, ANGELO SCARDINA and ELISABETH SCARDINA, Appellants,
v.
RAMZI AKEL and CATERINA AKEL, Appellees.
No. 4D18-3414
[September 12, 2019]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Lisa S. Small, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 502014CA004618XXXXMBAH and 502014CA005592XXXXMBAH.
Isaac J. Mitrani, Pamela A. Chamberlin and Daniel S. Bitran of Mitrani, Rynor, Adamsky & Toland, P.A., Miami Beach, for appellants Charles and Cheryl Scardina.
Gerald F. Richman and Gary S. Betensky of Day Pitney/Richman Greer, West Palm Beach, for appellants Angelo and Elisabeth Scardina.
Steven M. Katzman and Craig A. Rubinstein of Katzman, Wasserman, Bennardini & Rubinstein, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CHARLES SCARDINA v. RAMZI AKEL and CATERINA AKEL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-scardina-v-ramzi-akel-and-caterina-akel-fladistctapp-2019.