Charles S. Wentworth & Co. v. Reed

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Charles S. Wentworth & Co. v. Reed

90 A. 791, 77 N.H. 595, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 202

DecidedMay 5, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 90 A. 791 (Charles S. Wentworth & Co. v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles S. Wentworth & Co. v. Reed, 90 A. 791, 77 N.H. 595, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 202 (N.H. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Young, J.

Although the court has not acquired jurisdiction of Wentworth so that any decree it may make will bind him personally, it has acquired jurisdiction of him in so far as the locus is concerned; in other words, the decree in this action will be in personam in so far as it relates to the defendant and Wentworth & Co., but in rem in so far as Wentworth is concerned, unless he appears generally. In that case it will be in personam as to all the parties.

Exception sustained.

Plummer, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Young, J.

Although the court has not acquired jurisdiction of Wentworth so that any decree it may make will bind him personally, it has acquired jurisdiction of him in so far as the locus is concerned; in other words, the decree in this action will be in personam in so far as it relates to the defendant and Wentworth & Co., but in rem in so far as Wentworth is concerned, unless he appears generally. In that case it will be in personam as to all the parties.

Exception sustained.

Plummer, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 A. 791, 77 N.H. 595, 1914 N.H. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-s-wentworth-co-v-reed-nh-1914.