Charles S. Gilmore, and v. William Groswird and Raymond Micheletti
This text of 434 F.2d 1040 (Charles S. Gilmore, and v. William Groswird and Raymond Micheletti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
434 F.2d 1040
Charles S. GILMORE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
William GROSWIRD and Raymond Micheletti, Appellees.
No. 23783.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 8, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Stanley A. Weigel, Judge.
Charles Gilmore, in pro per.
William D. Jenkins, Legal Aid Society, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and TRASK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Upon the record, we find the entry of summary judgment was appropriate; that is, on the record, there was no issue appropriate for trial.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 F.2d 1040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-s-gilmore-and-v-william-groswird-and-raymo-ca9-1970.