Charles S. Gilmore, and v. William Groswird and Raymond Micheletti

Ninth Circuit

Charles S. Gilmore, and v. William Groswird and Raymond Micheletti

434 F.2d 1040

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 8, 1970·No. 23783·Published

Opinion

434 F.2d 1040

Charles S. GILMORE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
William GROSWIRD and Raymond Micheletti, Appellees.

No. 23783.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 8, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Stanley A. Weigel, Judge.

Charles Gilmore, in pro per.

William D. Jenkins, Legal Aid Society, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon the record, we find the entry of summary judgment was appropriate; that is, on the record, there was no issue appropriate for trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

434 F.2d 1040

Charles S. GILMORE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
William GROSWIRD and Raymond Micheletti, Appellees.

No. 23783.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

December 8, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Stanley A. Weigel, Judge.

Charles Gilmore, in pro per.

William D. Jenkins, Legal Aid Society, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, JERTBERG and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon the record, we find the entry of summary judgment was appropriate; that is, on the record, there was no issue appropriate for trial.

The judgment is affirmed.

Charles S. Gilmore, and v. William Groswird and Raymond Micheletti, 434 F.2d 1040 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

434 F.2d 1040 (Charles S. Gilmore, and v. William Groswird and Raymond Micheletti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.