Charles Raybon Horak v. Rick Painter, in His Individual and Official Capacity Delbert Harrison, in His Official Capacity

Fourth Circuit

Charles Raybon Horak v. Rick Painter, in His Individual and Official Capacity Delbert Harrison, in His Official Capacity

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17418, 1995 WL 309048

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 19, 1995

Docket94-7461

StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 773 (Charles Raybon Horak v. Rick Painter, in His Individual and Official Capacity Delbert Harrison, in His Official Capacity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Raybon Horak v. Rick Painter, in His Individual and Official Capacity Delbert Harrison, in His Official Capacity, 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17418, 1995 WL 309048 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Raybon HORAK, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Rick PAINTER, in his individual and official capacity;
Delbert Harrison, in his official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7461.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Charles Raybon Horak, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Horak v. Painter, No. CA-94-961 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Raybon HORAK, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Rick PAINTER, in his individual and official capacity;
Delbert Harrison, in his official capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7461.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Charles Raybon Horak, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Horak v. Painter, No. CA-94-961 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17418, 1995 WL 309048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-raybon-horak-v-rick-painter-in-his-individ-ca4-1995.