Charles Ray Miller v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 15, 2014·No. 06-14-00129-CR·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00129-CR

CHARLES RAY MILLER, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1423726

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In cause numbers 06-14-00120-CR through 06-14-00129-CR, Charles Ray Miller appeals

from ten separate convictions for indecency with a child by contact. Miller has filed a single brief in which he raises an issue common to all of his appeals. Miller argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel during the punishment phase of his trial.

We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date on Miller’s appeal in cause number 06-14-00120-CR. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude in this matter that Miller failed to demonstrate (1) that his counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) ); Ex parte Imoudu, 284 S.W.3d 866, 869 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009).

Consequently, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: December 11, 2014 Date Decided: December 12, 2014

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Ray Miller v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Charles Ray Miller v. State (Charles Ray Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Ex Parte Imoudu
284 S.W.3d 866 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)