Charles Ray Mason v. Tina D. Roan
This text of Charles Ray Mason v. Tina D. Roan (Charles Ray Mason v. Tina D. Roan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00545-CV ____________________
CHARLES RAY MASON, Appellant
V.
TINA D. ROAN, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 411th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. CIV23935 ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 16, 2014, Charles Ray Mason filed a notice of appeal. On
December 17, 2014, we notified Mason that the time for perfecting an appeal ran
from the date of the trial court’s order dismissing the suit for want of prosecution,
and we questioned our jurisdiction. Mason filed a reply to our letter in which he
alleges that the trial court signed an order dismissing the case for want of
prosecution on December 9, 2011. Mason stated in “Plaintiff’s Verified Motion to
Reinstate” which was filed on or about October 28, 2014, that he first received
1 notice that the case had been dismissed in October 2014. On December 5, 2014,
the trial court signed an order denying Mason’s motion to reinstate. Mason argues
that this Court has jurisdiction to hear his appeal because he contends he timely
filed his notice of appeal after the December 5, 2014 order denying his motion to
reinstate. We disagree.
The time for filing a notice of appeal runs from the date of the dismissal
order, not the date the trial court rules on a motion to reinstate. Hartford Ins. Grp.
v. Perez, No. 05-11-00195-CV, 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 4460, at *2 (Tex. App.—
Dallas June 13, 2011, no pet.); Weik v. Second Baptist Church of Houston, 988
S.W.2d 437, 438 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied). Mason failed
to perfect an appeal by filing a notice of appeal within the time permitted for either
a regular or a restricted appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. We dismiss the appeal for
lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice
Submitted on January 21, 2015 Opinion Delivered January 22, 2015
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Ray Mason v. Tina D. Roan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-ray-mason-v-tina-d-roan-texapp-2015.