Charles Ray Baker v. State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Charles Ray Baker v. State of Texas

DecidedNovember 18, 2010

Docket11-10-00296-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Charles Ray Baker v. State of Texas (Charles Ray Baker v. State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Ray Baker v. State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion filed November 18, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-10-00296-CR __________

CHARLES RAY BAKER, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 249th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F43766

MEMORANDUM OPINION Charles Ray Baker has filed in this court a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. In his motion, appellant states that there has been some confusion as to this case. Appellant wants to pursue a postconviction writ of habeas corpus and apparently did not intend for his pro se request to trigger a State appeal. We also note that the trial court stated in its certification of appellant’s right to appeal that appellant had waived his right to appeal and that this was a plea bargain agreement situation with no right to appeal. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

November 18, 2010 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion filed November 18, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-10-00296-CR __________

CHARLES RAY BAKER, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 249th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F43766

MEMORANDUM OPINION Charles Ray Baker has filed in this court a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. In his motion, appellant states that there has been some confusion as to this case. Appellant wants to pursue a postconviction writ of habeas corpus and apparently did not intend for his pro se request to trigger a State appeal. We also note that the trial court stated in its certification of appellant’s right to appeal that appellant had waived his right to appeal and that this was a plea bargain agreement situation with no right to appeal. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

November 18, 2010 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Strange, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Charles Ray Baker v. State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-ray-baker-v-state-of-texas-texapp-2010.