Charles Ralph Davis v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary, Respondent
This text of 376 F.2d 840 (Charles Ralph Davis v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary, Respondent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On remand of this petition for habeas corpus, after it was first heard in this court [see Davis v. Johnson, 354 F.2d 689 (C.A.6, 1966)], the District Judge conducted a plenary hearing on petitioner’s factual contentions. At the conclusion of that hearing, he found from the evidence that petitioner’s claim that he had been deprived of his constitutional right to counsel was not supported by the facts.
Our review of this record convinces us that the evidence amply supports his findings and conclusions of law.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 F.2d 840, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-ralph-davis-v-c-murray-henderson-warden-tennessee-state-ca6-1967.