Charles Ralph Davis v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary, Respondent
Opinion
On remand of this petition for habeas corpus, after it was first heard in this court [see Davis v. Johnson, 354 F.2d 689 (C.A.6, 1966)], the District Judge conducted a plenary hearing on petitioner’s factual contentions. At the conclusion of that hearing, he found from the evidence that petitioner’s claim that he had been deprived of his constitutional right to counsel was not supported by the facts.
Our review of this record convinces us that the evidence amply supports his findings and conclusions of law.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
376 F.2d 840 (Charles Ralph Davis v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary, Respondent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.