Charles R. Schetzer v. CIR

14 F. App'x 738
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 24, 2001
Docket99-4039
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 F. App'x 738 (Charles R. Schetzer v. CIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles R. Schetzer v. CIR, 14 F. App'x 738 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Charles Robert Schetzer appeals a tax court decision upholding the constitutionality of a tax statute used to assess tax deficiencies against Schetzer. Because we do not have jurisdiction to consider Schetzer’s appeal, we dismiss. Although Schetzer filed his notice of appeal with this court within 90 days of the tax court’s decision, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure required Schetzer to file his notice of appeal with the tax court clerk and do not make an exception for tax court appeals mistakenly filed with this court. See Fed. R.App. P. 13(a)(1), 14; cf. Fed. R.App. P. 4(d). Although the government takes a different view, we do not believe 28 U.S.C. § 1631 cures the jurisdictional defect in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 610 (as used in § 1631, term “courts” applies only to courts of appeal, district courts, and certain other courts; it does not apply to tax courts).

We thus dismiss Schetzer’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny his pending motion as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
532 F.3d 491 (Sixth Circuit, 2008)
William Mobley v. CIR
Sixth Circuit, 2008

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F. App'x 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-r-schetzer-v-cir-ca8-2001.