Charles R. Schetzer v. CIR
This text of 14 F. App'x 738 (Charles R. Schetzer v. CIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[UNPUBLISHED]
Charles Robert Schetzer appeals a tax court decision upholding the constitutionality of a tax statute used to assess tax deficiencies against Schetzer. Because we do not have jurisdiction to consider Schetzer’s appeal, we dismiss. Although Schetzer filed his notice of appeal with this court within 90 days of the tax court’s decision, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure required Schetzer to file his notice of appeal with the tax court clerk and do not make an exception for tax court appeals mistakenly filed with this court. See Fed. R.App. P. 13(a)(1), 14; cf. Fed. R.App. P. 4(d). Although the government takes a different view, we do not believe 28 U.S.C. § 1631 cures the jurisdictional defect in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 610 (as used in § 1631, term “courts” applies only to courts of appeal, district courts, and certain other courts; it does not apply to tax courts).
We thus dismiss Schetzer’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny his pending motion as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F. App'x 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-r-schetzer-v-cir-ca8-2001.