Charles R. Peet v. Eric K. Shinseki
This text of 25 Vet. App. 82 (Charles R. Peet v. Eric K. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On September 7, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to submit memoranda of law by October 7, 2011. On October 6, 2011, the parties filed a joint motion to stay further proceedings, indicating that they were in the final stages of negotiating a joint motion for remand but needed additional time to finalize such a motion. The following day, the parties filed a joint motion for remand.
As the parties filed their joint motion for remand prior to the expiration of the Court-ordered deadline for filing their memoranda of law, there is no need to stay proceedings and the Court will therefore deny the parties’ joint motion to stay further proceedings. The Court will also grant their joint motion for remand.
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the parties’ October 6, 2011, joint motion to stay further proceedings is denied. It is further
ORDERED that the parties’ October 7, 2011, joint motion for remand is GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Vet. App. 82, 2011 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 2158, 2011 WL 4816094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-r-peet-v-eric-k-shinseki-cavc-2011.