Charles Purcilla and Timothy McLean v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan
This text of 261 F.2d 833 (Charles Purcilla and Timothy McLean v. William H. Bannan, Warden, State Prison of Southern Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause has been heard and considered on appeal by two convicts from the denial of a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by them.
Having duly considered the briefs and oral arguments and the record in the cause, conclusion has been reached that the dismissal of the petition for writ of habeas corpus by the district court was correct, for the reasons stated by United States District Judge Thornton in his carefully prepared and detailed opinion.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 F.2d 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-purcilla-and-timothy-mclean-v-william-h-bannan-warden-state-ca6-1958.