Charles Podaras v. City of Menlo Park

427 F. App'x 614
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2011·No. 10-15200·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*615 MEMORANDUM ***

Charles Podaras appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Section 1983 civil rights claim. Podaras contends that the district court erred when it dismissed his claim as time barred.

Because Section 1983 does not provide a limitations period, federal courts look to the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury torts. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 276, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985); Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989). In this instance, the applicable statute of limitations is two years. Cal.Civ.Proc.Code section 335.1; Maldonado v. Harris, 370 F.3d 945, 954 (9th Cir.2004). Podaras filed too late.

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Podaras v. City of Menlo Park, 427 F. App'x 614 (9th Cir. 2011).

427 F. App'x 614 (Charles Podaras v. City of Menlo Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Podaras v. City of Menlo Park
181 L. Ed. 2d 348 (Supreme Court, 2011)