Charles Podaras v. City of Menlo Park

427 F. App'x 614
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 2011
Docket10-15200
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 427 F. App'x 614 (Charles Podaras v. City of Menlo Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Podaras v. City of Menlo Park, 427 F. App'x 614 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

*615 MEMORANDUM ***

Charles Podaras appeals the district court’s dismissal of his Section 1983 civil rights claim. Podaras contends that the district court erred when it dismissed his claim as time barred.

Because Section 1983 does not provide a limitations period, federal courts look to the forum state’s statute of limitations for personal injury torts. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 276, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985); Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594 (1989). In this instance, the applicable statute of limitations is two years. Cal.Civ.Proc.Code section 335.1; Maldonado v. Harris, 370 F.3d 945, 954 (9th Cir.2004). Podaras filed too late.

AFFIRMED.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Podaras v. City of Menlo Park
181 L. Ed. 2d 348 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 F. App'x 614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-podaras-v-city-of-menlo-park-ca9-2011.