Charles Pena v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 16, 2009·No. 04-09-00664-CR·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-09-00664-CR & 04-09-00665-CR

Charles PENA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 292745 & 292744 Honorable Brenda Chapman, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 16, 2009

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

The trial court imposed sentence on August 5, 2009, and appellant did not file a timely

motion for new trial. The deadline for filing a notice of appeal was therefore due September 5, 2009.

See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.2(a)(1). The notice of appeal was not filed until September 21, 2009, and the

clerk’s record shows the notice of appeal was not deposited in the mail before the last day for filing. 04-09-00664-CR & 04-09-00665-CR

In fact, the notice of appeal shows it was not completed until September 5, 2009, the day after it was

due. No motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.3.

On November 3, 2009, we ordered appellant to show why this appeal should not be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction. On December 3, 2009, appellant filed a response in which he admits the

notice of appeal was untimely, and for the first time seeks an extension of time to file the notice of

appeal. A motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal must be filed in this court within fifteen

days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. TEX . R. APP . P. 26.3. Here, the motion to

extend time to file the notice of appeal had to be filed on or before September 21, 2009, but was not

filed until December 3, 2009. See id.

Because neither the notice of appeal nor the motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal

was timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519,

522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of

Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions); see also TEX . R. APP . P.

26.3. Accordingly, we dismiss the motion for extension of time and the appeal for want of

jurisdiction.

Do not publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Pena v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Charles Pena v. State (Charles Pena v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)