Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

288 F.2d 169
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1961
Docket16047
StatusPublished

This text of 288 F.2d 169 (Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, 288 F.2d 169 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

Opinion

288 F.2d 169

109 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 128 U.S.P.Q. 516

Charles P. GROSS, Appellant,
v.
Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.

No. 16047.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 8, 1961.
Decided March 16, 1961, Petition for Rehearing Denied April 11, 1961.

Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. David Kreider, Attorney, United States Patent Office, with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to obtain a patent. We re-affirm all that we said in Schafer v. Watson, U.S.App.D.C. , 288 F.2d 144.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jack Daniel Distillery, Inc. v. Hoffman Distilling Co.
190 F. Supp. 841 (W.D. Kentucky, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 F.2d 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-p-gross-v-robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-patents-cadc-1961.