Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

288 F.2d 169
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 11, 1961·No. 16047·Published

Opinion

288 F.2d 169

109 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 128 U.S.P.Q. 516

Charles P. GROSS, Appellant,
v.
Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.

No. 16047.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 8, 1961.
Decided March 16, 1961, Petition for Rehearing Denied April 11, 1961.

Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. David Kreider, Attorney, United States Patent Office, with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit to obtain a patent. We re-affirm all that we said in Schafer v. Watson, U.S.App.D.C. , 288 F.2d 144.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, 288 F.2d 169 (D.C. Cir. 1961).

288 F.2d 169 (Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jack Daniel Distillery, Inc. v. Hoffman Distilling Co.
190 F. Supp. 841 (W.D. Kentucky, 1960)