Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents
This text of 288 F.2d 169 (Charles P. Gross v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
288 F.2d 169
109 U.S.App.D.C. 385, 128 U.S.P.Q. 516
Charles P. GROSS, Appellant,
v.
Robert C. WATSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.
No. 16047.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 8, 1961.
Decided March 16, 1961, Petition for Rehearing Denied April 11, 1961.
Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. A. Yates Dowell, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. David Kreider, Attorney, United States Patent Office, with whom Mr. Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is a suit to obtain a patent. We re-affirm all that we said in Schafer v. Watson, U.S.App.D.C. , 288 F.2d 144.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 F.2d 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-p-gross-v-robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-patents-cadc-1961.