Charles Newman Smith, Jr. v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Charles Newman Smith, Jr. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 500 S.W.3d 685 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2016·No. 03-15-00668-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2016

NO. 03-15-00668-CR

Charles Newman Smith, Jr., Appellant

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2016

NO. 03-15-00668-CR

Charles Newman Smith, Jr., Appellant

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 424TH DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Charles Newman Smith, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Charles Newman Smith, Jr. v. State (Charles Newman Smith, Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.