Charles N. Cresap v. Chemplast, Inc
This text of 316 F.2d 920 (Charles N. Cresap v. Chemplast, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue presented for our determination on this appeal is the validity of U.S. Patent No. 2,929,109. An examination of the record convinces us that the patent discloses nothing of patentable novelty. It seems, mechanical ingenuity aside, to •contain nothing not adequately shown by the prior art. We conclude that it would not serve any useful purpose to review the evidence or the arguments of the parties here. Nothing can be added of consequence to the carefully prepared opinion of Judge Meaney in the court below. 216 F.Supp. 870. The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 F.2d 920, 137 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 392, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-n-cresap-v-chemplast-inc-ca3-1963.