Charles Muguchia v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
This text of 498 F. App'x 671 (Charles Muguchia v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kenyan citizen Charles Mwangi Muguc-hia petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which upheld an immigration judge’s decision denying him asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Muguchia was denied asylum based on the untimeliness of his application, and was denied withholding of removal and CAT relief based on the merits of his requests. After careful review, we find no basis for reversal. First, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determinations regarding the untimeliness of Muguchia’s asylum application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3). Second, we conclude that substantial evidence supported the denials of withholding of removal and CAT relief. See Wijono v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 868, 872, 874 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review); see also Uli v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 950, 956-57 (8th Cir.2008) (State Department reports can support factual finding of changed conditions to rebut presumption of future persecution). Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
498 F. App'x 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-muguchia-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca8-2013.