Charles Moorhead v. Dahlia Reyes
Opinion
NUMBER 13-19-00047-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
CHARLES MOORHEAD, Appellant,
v.
DAHLIA REYES, ET AL., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides The appellant’s brief in the above cause was due on April 8, 2019. On April 15,
2019, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the
Court’s letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response
has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain the failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).
GINA M. BENAVIDES, Justice
Delivered and filed the 6th day of June, 2019.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles Moorhead v. Dahlia Reyes (Charles Moorhead v. Dahlia Reyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.