Charles Mims, Jr. v. United Parcel Service

283 F. App'x 417
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 2008
Docket07-1935
StatusUnpublished

This text of 283 F. App'x 417 (Charles Mims, Jr. v. United Parcel Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Mims, Jr. v. United Parcel Service, 283 F. App'x 417 (8th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Mims, Jr., appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination suit brought under Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act, together with his state-law claims. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most favorable to Mims, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman, 289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mims’s request for preparation of a transcript at government expense and United Parcel Service’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply.

1

. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 F. App'x 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-mims-jr-v-united-parcel-service-ca8-2008.