Charles M. Queen v. Marvin H. Jones

D.C. Circuit

Charles M. Queen v. Marvin H. Jones

221 F.2d 859

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 1955

Docket11963_1

StatusPublished

This text of 221 F.2d 859 (Charles M. Queen v. Marvin H. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles M. Queen v. Marvin H. Jones, 221 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a District Court judgment against him for criminal conversation. The judgment was rendered in a suit for divorce wherein he was named as co-respondent in connection with charges of adultery and made a co-defendant. We find no merit in his sole contention that the findings of fact with regard to adultery and criminal conversation are clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a District Court judgment against him for criminal conversation. The judgment was rendered in a suit for divorce wherein he was named as co-respondent in connection with charges of adultery and made a co-defendant. We find no merit in his sole contention that the findings of fact with regard to adultery and criminal conversation are clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 F.2d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-m-queen-v-marvin-h-jones-cadc-1955.