Charles M. Queen v. Marvin H. Jones
221 F.2d 859
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of a District Court judgment against him for criminal conversation. The judgment was rendered in a suit for divorce wherein he was named as co-respondent in connection with charges of adultery and made a co-defendant. We find no merit in his sole contention that the findings of fact with regard to adultery and criminal conversation are clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles M. Queen v. Marvin H. Jones, 221 F.2d 859 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
221 F.2d 859 (Charles M. Queen v. Marvin H. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.