Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary

Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1996·No. 02S01-9505-CV-00035·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Filed: September 9, 1996

CHARLES M. CARY, JR., )

) Hardeman Law

Appellant, )

)

VS. ) No. 02S01-9505-CV-00035 )

CATHY ANN CARY, )

Appellee,

) ) FILED

September 9, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion to amend the judgment to

delete the award of attorney fees, the Court concludes that the motion is without

merit and should be denied. It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary, (Tenn. 1996).

Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary (Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.