Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary

CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 1996
Docket02S01-9505-CV-00035
StatusPublished

This text of Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary (Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary, (Tenn. 1996).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Filed: September 9, 1996

CHARLES M. CARY, JR., ) ) Hardeman Law Appellant, ) ) VS. ) No. 02S01-9505-CV-00035 ) CATHY ANN CARY, )

Appellee, ) ) FILED September 9, 1996

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion to amend the judgment to

delete the award of attorney fees, the Court concludes that the motion is without

merit and should be denied. It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-m-cary-jr-v-cathy-ann-cary-tenn-1996.