Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary
This text of Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary (Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE
AT JACKSON
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Filed: September 9, 1996
CHARLES M. CARY, JR., ) ) Hardeman Law Appellant, ) ) VS. ) No. 02S01-9505-CV-00035 ) CATHY ANN CARY, )
Appellee, ) ) FILED September 9, 1996
Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk ORDER
Upon consideration of the appellant’s motion to amend the judgment to
delete the award of attorney fees, the Court concludes that the motion is without
merit and should be denied. It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles M. Cary, Jr. v. Cathy Ann Cary, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-m-cary-jr-v-cathy-ann-cary-tenn-1996.