Charles Lugo v. State
This text of Charles Lugo v. State (Charles Lugo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Appellant's motion to supplement the clerk's record or, alternatively, for abatement to develop the record is granted in part. The district clerk is instructed to prepare a supplemental record containing copies of: (1) the requests for evidentiary hearing dated July 16, 2007, November 2, 2007, and January 16, 2008; (2) the correspondence from David Shulman to Judge Carnes dated May 24, 2008, and June 20, 2008, if this correspondence is on file; (3) the State's response to appellant's motion for new trial; and (4) the affidavit of Robert Andrews referenced in the trial court's order denying appellant's motion for new trial. The supplemental clerk's record is due no later than January 22, 2009. The motion to supplement is otherwise overruled.
Appellant's third motion for extension of time to file brief is granted. Appellant's brief will be due twenty days after the supplemental clerk's record is filed in this Court.
It is ordered January 7, 2009.
Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Lugo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-lugo-v-state-texapp-2009.