Charles Leo Anderson III v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: April 14, 2015
• Docket: 13-15-00002-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-15-00002-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CHARLES LEO ANDERSON III, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Order Per Curiam Appellant’s appointed counsel, Ruben R. Lerma, Jr., has filed a motion requesting

to withdraw as counsel. According to his motion to withdraw, good cause exists for him

to withdraw. Counsel states that appellant has specified ineffective assistance of

counsel as a basis to appeal and counsel believes a conflict exists preventing counsel

from continuing as appellant’s attorney. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 176 S.W.3d 249, 255

(Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with

a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of

this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court

for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s court-appointed

attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to

new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge

appellant’s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall

enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number

of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial

court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be

filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of

this order.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 14th day of April, 2015.