Charles Lee McIntosh v. Honorable Mell Underwood

Sixth Circuit

Charles Lee McIntosh v. Honorable Mell Underwood

189 F.2d 970, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3267

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1951

Docket11378

StatusPublished

This text of 189 F.2d 970 (Charles Lee McIntosh v. Honorable Mell Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Lee McIntosh v. Honorable Mell Underwood, 189 F.2d 970, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3267 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the respondent herein on April 20, 1951 filed his response to the order to show cause issued herein on April 9, 1951, which shows that said respondent on April 4, 1951 entered an order denying petitioner leave to proceed in forma pau-peris in the matter upon which petitioner’s complaint was based;

And said response being deemed sufficient ;

It is ordered that petitioner’s application for Mandamus be denied and this proceeding dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the respondent herein on April 20, 1951 filed his response to the order to show cause issued herein on April 9, 1951, which shows that said respondent on April 4, 1951 entered an order denying petitioner leave to proceed in forma pau-peris in the matter upon which petitioner’s complaint was based;

And said response being deemed sufficient ;

It is ordered that petitioner’s application for Mandamus be denied and this proceeding dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 F.2d 970, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-lee-mcintosh-v-honorable-mell-underwood-ca6-1951.