Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 7, 2012
Docket05-12-01542-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State (Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Dismiss and Opinion Filed l)ccembcr 7 , 2012

In Tue Qcottrt of tppat jfIftlj itrict of cxa at Dafta No. 05-124)1540-CR No, 05-12-01541-CR No, 05-12-01542-CR

Cl IARLES LARRY 1 ItJNNICIJT[, Appellant

V.

Ti IF Si’AT} OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd .Judicial 1)istrict Court I)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F-09-6 I 782-T, F09-6 1 783-T, F09-61 73-T

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Charles Larry 1-Tunnicutt was convicted of three aggravated sexual assault of a child

offenses. In each case, punishment was assessed at twenty years’ imprisonment and was

imposed in open court on September 7, 2010. On September 5, 2012, appellant filed a motion to

obtain free copies of the records of the cases, which the trial court denied by written order on

October 10. 2012. Appellant has appealed the trial court’s order denying his motion to obtain

fiee copies of the records. Appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals by criminal defendants only upon

conviction or from certain statutorily designated appealable orders. See Wright v. State, 969

S.W.2d 558, 589—90 (Tex. App.—1998, no pet.). An order denying a motion for a free copy of

the record is not an appealable order.

We dismiss the appeals for want ofjurisdiction.

Do Not Publish Thx. R. An. P.47

121540F.U05 Qtourt of pptat fifth OItrict of exa at Oa1ta

JUDGMENT

(1 1t\RLlS Li\RRY I IIJNNICUTT, Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Trial Court No. F-09-61 782-T). No. 05-124)1540-CR V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Bridges and Myers participating. iRE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction,

December 7, 2012 Judgment entered

C ‘\R()LYN WRI(;1 I’l (‘1 lII:F illS IJ(l Qrotirt of tppea1 jf iftb Ji13ttrirt of Exa at I3at1a JUDGMENT

CF IAR LES LARRY [IUNN ICUTT. Appeal from the 283rd Judicial I)istrict Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Trial Court No. F-09-61783-T). No, 05-12-01541-CR V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Bridges and Myers participating. TIlE STATE OF TEXAS, Appeilce

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of urisdiction.

C \ROl YN WRIGI IT (‘I 1111 J[ ‘S’Fl(I (ourt of 1ppeat if ifØj itrict of rtxa at afta

(ITARLES LARRY HUNNICUTT, Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District /\ppel I ant Court of I)allas County, Texas (Trial Court No. F-09-6 1 784-T). No, 05-20I542CR V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Bridges and Myers participating. TIlE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Courts opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

(‘AR()I YN WRIGI II’ (‘I Ill]’ ji;si i(i

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Garland v. Dallas Morning News
969 S.W.2d 548 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-larry-hunnicutt-v-state-texapp-2012.