Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State
This text of Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State (Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss and Opinion Filed l)ccembcr 7 , 2012
In Tue Qcottrt of tppat jfIftlj itrict of cxa at Dafta No. 05-124)1540-CR No, 05-12-01541-CR No, 05-12-01542-CR
Cl IARLES LARRY 1 ItJNNICIJT[, Appellant
V.
Ti IF Si’AT} OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd .Judicial 1)istrict Court I)allas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F-09-6 I 782-T, F09-6 1 783-T, F09-61 73-T
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Bridges and Myers Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
Charles Larry 1-Tunnicutt was convicted of three aggravated sexual assault of a child
offenses. In each case, punishment was assessed at twenty years’ imprisonment and was
imposed in open court on September 7, 2010. On September 5, 2012, appellant filed a motion to
obtain free copies of the records of the cases, which the trial court denied by written order on
October 10. 2012. Appellant has appealed the trial court’s order denying his motion to obtain
fiee copies of the records. Appellate courts have jurisdiction over appeals by criminal defendants only upon
conviction or from certain statutorily designated appealable orders. See Wright v. State, 969
S.W.2d 558, 589—90 (Tex. App.—1998, no pet.). An order denying a motion for a free copy of
the record is not an appealable order.
We dismiss the appeals for want ofjurisdiction.
Do Not Publish Thx. R. An. P.47
121540F.U05 Qtourt of pptat fifth OItrict of exa at Oa1ta
JUDGMENT
(1 1t\RLlS Li\RRY I IIJNNICUTT, Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Trial Court No. F-09-61 782-T). No. 05-124)1540-CR V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Bridges and Myers participating. iRE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction,
December 7, 2012 Judgment entered
C ‘\R()LYN WRI(;1 I’l (‘1 lII:F illS IJ(l Qrotirt of tppea1 jf iftb Ji13ttrirt of Exa at I3at1a JUDGMENT
CF IAR LES LARRY [IUNN ICUTT. Appeal from the 283rd Judicial I)istrict Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Trial Court No. F-09-61783-T). No, 05-12-01541-CR V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Bridges and Myers participating. TIlE STATE OF TEXAS, Appeilce
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of urisdiction.
C \ROl YN WRIGI IT (‘I 1111 J[ ‘S’Fl(I (ourt of 1ppeat if ifØj itrict of rtxa at afta
(ITARLES LARRY HUNNICUTT, Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District /\ppel I ant Court of I)allas County, Texas (Trial Court No. F-09-6 1 784-T). No, 05-20I542CR V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Bridges and Myers participating. TIlE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Based on the Courts opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
(‘AR()I YN WRIGI II’ (‘I Ill]’ ji;si i(i
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Larry Hunnicutt v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-larry-hunnicutt-v-state-texapp-2012.