Charles L. Nichols Et Ux. v. Copperite, Inc., Charles W. Mayer Et Ux. v. Copperite, Inc.
This text of 283 F.2d 866 (Charles L. Nichols Et Ux. v. Copperite, Inc., Charles W. Mayer Et Ux. v. Copperite, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
283 F.2d 866
Charles L. NICHOLS et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Charles W. MAYER et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
COPPERITE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 14036, 14037.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 31, 1960.
Carroll D. Kilgore, Nashville, Tenn., for appellants.
Thomas J. Johnson, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Tyree B. Harris, III, Nashville, Tenn., Defrees, Fiske, O'Brien, Thomson & Simmons, Chicago, Ill., and Hooker, Keeble, Dodson & Harris, Nashville, Tenn., on brief, for appellee.
Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the Court being duly advised:
Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge William E. Miller.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 F.2d 866, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 3442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-l-nichols-et-ux-v-copperite-inc-charles-w--ca6-1960.