Charles Kruchen Co. v. Mayor of Paterson

101 A. 254, 90 N.J.L. 700, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 408
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1917·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Wilhelmina Koettegen v. the Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Paterson et al., No. 149 of the present term of this court.

For affw-mcmce—The Chancellor, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppentieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Kruchen Co. v. Mayor of Paterson, 101 A. 254, 90 N.J.L. 700, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 408 (N.J. 1917).

101 A. 254 (Charles Kruchen Co. v. Mayor of Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.