Charles Kerr v. State
This text of Charles Kerr v. State (Charles Kerr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00283-CR
Charles Kerr, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 12,049, HONORABLE TERRY L. FLENNIKEN, JUDGE PRESIDING
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Charles Kerr has filed what purports to be a pro se notice of appeal from either a 2006 order placing him on probation or a 2008 order revoking his probation. In either case, the district court has certified that this a plea-bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. Additionally, Kerr's notice of appeal, which was filed on April 12, 2012, is untimely. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
The appeal is dismissed.
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: July 13, 2012
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Charles Kerr v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-kerr-v-state-texapp-2012.