Charles Kenneth Honaker v. Walter E. Malone

Sixth Circuit

Charles Kenneth Honaker v. Walter E. Malone

229 F.2d 738, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1955

Docket12404

StatusPublished

This text of 229 F.2d 738 (Charles Kenneth Honaker v. Walter E. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Kenneth Honaker v. Walter E. Malone, 229 F.2d 738, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748 (6th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on appeal from the judgment of the district court in an action brought by appellants for adjudication of rights under lease contracts and in the alternative for damages for losses alleged to have accrued from delay of appellees in furnishing a good and marketable title to appellants;

And this court, having duly considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and the record in the case, is of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed for the reasons given in the oral opinion of Judge Cecil, constituting ten pages of the appendix record, and upon the basis of his findings of fact and conclusions of law in conformity therewith.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on appeal from the judgment of the district court in an action brought by appellants for adjudication of rights under lease contracts and in the alternative for damages for losses alleged to have accrued from delay of appellees in furnishing a good and marketable title to appellants;

And this court, having duly considered the oral arguments and briefs of the parties and the record in the case, is of opinion that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed for the reasons given in the oral opinion of Judge Cecil, constituting ten pages of the appendix record, and upon the basis of his findings of fact and conclusions of law in conformity therewith.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 F.2d 738, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-kenneth-honaker-v-walter-e-malone-ca6-1955.