Charles K. Cregier v. Conway P. Coe, Commissioner of Patents.

291 U.S. 683, 54 S. Ct. 560
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 19, 1934
Docket772
StatusPublished

This text of 291 U.S. 683 (Charles K. Cregier v. Conway P. Coe, Commissioner of Patents.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles K. Cregier v. Conway P. Coe, Commissioner of Patents., 291 U.S. 683, 54 S. Ct. 560 (1934).

Opinion

291 U.S. 683

54 S.Ct. 560

78 L.Ed. 1070

Charles K. CREGIER, petitioner,
v.
Conway P. COE, Commissioner of Patents.*

No. 772.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 1934

Mr. Henry E. Stauffer, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

The Attorney General and Messrs. J. Crawford Biggs, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., Charles Bunn, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

For opinion below, see 67 F.(2d) 692.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied.

*

Rehearing denied 292 U. S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 712, 78 L. Ed. —-.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cregier v. Coe
67 F.2d 692 (D.C. Circuit, 1933)
Amplus Storage Battery Co. v. United States
291 U.S. 683 (Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 U.S. 683, 54 S. Ct. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-k-cregier-v-conway-p-coe-commissioner-of-patents-scotus-1934.