Charles Jerome Adams, Claimant-Appellant v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Charles Jerome Adams, Claimant-Appellant v. United States

73 F.3d 356, 1996 WL 4343

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1996

Docket94-2125

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 356 (Charles Jerome Adams, Claimant-Appellant v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Jerome Adams, Claimant-Appellant v. United States, 73 F.3d 356, 1996 WL 4343 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 356
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Jerome ADAMS, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2125.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 1995.
Decided: Jan. 5, 1996.

Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his Rule 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Adams v. United States, No. CA-94-363-1-6BD (D.S.C. Jun. 21, 1994 & Aug. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 356
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Charles Jerome ADAMS, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-2125.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 1995.
Decided: Jan. 5, 1996.

Charles Jerome Adams, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his Rule 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Adams v. United States, No. CA-94-363-1-6BD (D.S.C. Jun. 21, 1994 & Aug. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 356, 1996 WL 4343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-jerome-adams-claimant-appellant-v-united-s-ca4-1996.