Charles (Jamourian) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Charles (Jamourian) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

DecidedJune 25, 2014

Docket65576

StatusUnpublished

This text of Charles (Jamourian) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Charles (Jamourian) v. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles (Jamourian) v. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

satisfied that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b). ORDER the petition DENIED. 1

Hardesty

1 Petitioners submitted a document under seal to this court on May 6, 2014. A party seeking to seal a document in a criminal case pending in this court must file a written motion that identifies the document or information the party seeks to seal and the grounds upon which sealing the subject documents is justified, specifies the duration of the sealing order, and explains why less restrictive means will not adequately protect the material. Howard U. State, 128 Nev. , 291 P.3d 137, 142-43 (2012). Petitioners have not sought to seal the document submitted in accordance with Howard. However, having reviewed the document, it does not appear that it is necessary to our resolution of the petition. Therefore, we direct the clerk of this court to return unfiled the document received on May 6, 2014.

Further, we lift the stay of the trial imposed on May 9, 2014.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 AA 1947A cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Washoe County Alternate Public Defender Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME Count OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A 0,S1111#D

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

satisfied that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b). ORDER the petition DENIED. 1

Hardesty

1 Petitioners submitted a document under seal to this court on May 6, 2014. A party seeking to seal a document in a criminal case pending in this court must file a written motion that identifies the document or information the party seeks to seal and the grounds upon which sealing the subject documents is justified, specifies the duration of the sealing order, and explains why less restrictive means will not adequately protect the material. Howard U. State, 128 Nev. , 291 P.3d 137, 142-43 (2012). Petitioners have not sought to seal the document submitted in accordance with Howard. However, having reviewed the document, it does not appear that it is necessary to our resolution of the petition. Therefore, we direct the clerk of this court to return unfiled the document received on May 6, 2014.

Further, we lift the stay of the trial imposed on May 9, 2014.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 AA 1947A cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Washoe County Alternate Public Defender Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME Count OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A 0,S1111#D

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Charles (Jamourian) v. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-jamourian-v-dist-ct-state-nev-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack