Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison

Ninth Circuit

Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison

435 F.2d 560

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 6, 1971·No. 23813·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Habeas corpus relief was sought in the district court essentially on the grounds of saturated publicity (see Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600) and that the jury was thereby prejudiced. Relief was denied and we affirm.

Appellant simply does not bring himself within Sheppard and other related decisions where relief was granted.

It appears that appellant is indulging in successive petitions. It may soon be time to apply 28 U.S.C. § 2244.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Habeas corpus relief was sought in the district court essentially on the grounds of saturated publicity (see Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600) and that the jury was thereby prejudiced. Relief was denied and we affirm.

Appellant simply does not bring himself within Sheppard and other related decisions where relief was granted.

It appears that appellant is indulging in successive petitions. It may soon be time to apply 28 U.S.C. § 2244.

Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, 435 F.2d 560 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

435 F.2d 560 (Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related