Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison

Ninth Circuit

Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison

435 F.2d 560

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 6, 1971

Docket23813

StatusPublished

This text of 435 F.2d 560 (Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles J. Carter v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison, 435 F.2d 560 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Habeas corpus relief was sought in the district court essentially on the grounds of saturated publicity (see Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600) and that the jury was thereby prejudiced. Relief was denied and we affirm.

Appellant simply does not bring himself within Sheppard and other related decisions where relief was granted.

It appears that appellant is indulging in successive petitions. It may soon be time to apply 28 U.S.C. § 2244.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Habeas corpus relief was sought in the district court essentially on the grounds of saturated publicity (see Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600) and that the jury was thereby prejudiced. Relief was denied and we affirm.

Appellant simply does not bring himself within Sheppard and other related decisions where relief was granted.

It appears that appellant is indulging in successive petitions. It may soon be time to apply 28 U.S.C. § 2244.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

435 F.2d 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-j-carter-v-frank-a-eyman-warden-arizona-state-prison-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack