Charles I. Spiesel v. Allan Roos

Second Circuit

Charles I. Spiesel v. Allan Roos

392 F.2d 978, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7172

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 26, 1968

Docket32001

StatusPublished

This text of 392 F.2d 978 (Charles I. Spiesel v. Allan Roos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles I. Spiesel v. Allan Roos, 392 F.2d 978, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7172 (2d Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

392 F.2d 978

Charles I. SPIESEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Allan ROOS et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 452, Docket 32001.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 25, 1968.
Decided April 26, 1968.

Myron A. Ellis, New York City, for appellant.

John J. Langan, New York City (Schaffner & D'Onofrio and F. V. Mina, New York City, on the brief), for appellee Pinkerton's National Detective Agency.

F. Roberts Blair, New York City for appellee James Butler.

Before HAYS, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI