Charles Henry Hall v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas

339 F.2d 316, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3592
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1964·No. 7892·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, a state prisoner, was denied relief after a full evidentiary hearing upon his petition for a writ of *317 habeas corpus lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. He contends upon appeal, as he did below, that his state court conviction was not warranted by the evidence and is so faulty in such regard as to deny him due process of law.

The record of the state court proceedings is not devoid of evidentiary support so as to warrant relief by habeas corpus. See Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 80 S.Ct. 624, 4 L. Ed.2d 654. A summary of the evidence is set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Kansas, State v. Hall, 182 Kan. 331, 320 P.2d 860, and was held sufficient by that court to sustain the conviction.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Henry Hall v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas, 339 F.2d 316, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3592 (10th Cir. 1964).

339 F.2d 316 (Charles Henry Hall v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tinoco v. United States
D. New Mexico, 2021
Evans v. Swenson
332 F. Supp. 360 (E.D. Missouri, 1971)
LaBlanc v. Patterson
294 F. Supp. 607 (D. Colorado, 1968)
Samuel H. Sheppard v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden
346 F.2d 707 (Sixth Circuit, 1965)