Charles Gilliland v. Iwona Papke

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 28, 2005·No. 01-03-00750-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued July 28, 2005





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NO. 01-03-00750-CV

____________


IWONA PAPKE, Appellant


V.


CHARLES GILLILAND, Appellee





On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 781,243





MEMORANDUM OPINION

          We received a letter from appellant’s counsel stating that the parties had settled. Because no motion to dismiss was filed, on June 27, 2005, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that unless, within 10 days of the date of the notice, appellant responded to the notice, the appeal would be dismissed. See Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex. App. –Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ) (existence of actual controversy is essential to exercise of appellate jurisdiction).

Appellant has not responded to the notice.

          Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Taft, Keyes, and Bland.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Gilliland v. Iwona Papke, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Charles Gilliland v. Iwona Papke (Charles Gilliland v. Iwona Papke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks
562 S.W.2d 933 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)