Charles Garza v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 2, 2006
Docket13-06-00566-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Charles Garza v. State (Charles Garza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Garza v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-566-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________________ _____



CHARLES GARZA, Appellant,



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________ _____



On appeal from the 347th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, CHARLES GARZA, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. Sentence in this cause was imposed on October 17, 2005. No timely motion for new trial was filed. The notice of appeal was due to be filed on November 16, 2005, but was not filed until September 18, 2006. Said notice of appeal is untimely filed.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and a motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 2nd day of November, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Charles Garza v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-garza-v-state-texapp-2006.