Charles Galloway v. United States

667 F. App'x 80
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 29, 2016
Docket16-6541
StatusUnpublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 80 (Charles Galloway v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Galloway v. United States, 667 F. App'x 80 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Leonard Galloway seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), to another district. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Galloway seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See TechnoSteel, LLC v. Beers Constr. Co., 271 F.3d 151, 154 & n.2 (4th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we deny Galloway’s motion to assign counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-galloway-v-united-states-ca4-2016.