Charles Gaines v. J. J. Clark, Warden

Fifth Circuit

Charles Gaines v. J. J. Clark, Warden

445 F.2d 654, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9326

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJune 24, 1971

Docket71-1551

StatusPublished

This text of 445 F.2d 654 (Charles Gaines v. J. J. Clark, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Gaines v. J. J. Clark, Warden, 445 F.2d 654, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9326 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gaines, a federal prisoner incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief by *655 the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The petition was based on the contention that he was being denied effective representation of counsel with regard to his pending appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The order of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 See also F.R.Crim.P. 38(a) (2). 2

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

2

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se ease summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gaines, a federal prisoner incarcerated in the United States Penitentiary at Atlanta, Georgia, appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief by *655 the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The petition was based on the contention that he was being denied effective representation of counsel with regard to his pending appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The order of the district court is affirmed. See Local Rule 21. 1 See also F.R.Crim.P. 38(a) (2). 2

1

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).

2

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se ease summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

445 F.2d 654, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-gaines-v-j-j-clark-warden-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack