Charles Frederick Noonan v. United States

262 F.2d 585
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1958
Docket13604
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 F.2d 585 (Charles Frederick Noonan v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Frederick Noonan v. United States, 262 F.2d 585 (6th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence of thirty years’ imprisonment: of which twenty-five years was on a kidnaping count and five years on a count charging transportation in interstate commerce of a stolen vehicle in violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2311 et seq. This sentence was reduced to twenty-five years by the United States District Judge, who made the two sentences run concurrently.

Counsel for appellant presented ably and vigorously the alleged grounds for vacation of sentence, none of which, after full consideration of the oral arguments, briefs and the record in the case, is in our opinion valid. Questions presented by appellant here were those which could have been raised, or were raised, during the trial of the case, following which no appeal was taken; and these questions will not be reviewed by this court in a proceeding under section 2255, Title 28 United States Code.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weinberger v. United States
71 F. Supp. 2d 803 (S.D. Ohio, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 F.2d 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-frederick-noonan-v-united-states-ca6-1958.