Charles F. Exum, Jr. v. Dampskibbelskabet Torm, A/s, Dampskibbelskabet Torm, A/s v. Charles F. Exum, Jr.
This text of 387 F.2d 639 (Charles F. Exum, Jr. v. Dampskibbelskabet Torm, A/s, Dampskibbelskabet Torm, A/s v. Charles F. Exum, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Careful consideration of the record makes it plain that while the damages awarded to appellant were small in view of the possible findings of injury, the judgment awarded can not be vacated as being clearly erroneous or “unconscionably inadequate,” as charged by the appellant.
The remaining issues in the case, involving factual determinations of negligence, also being supported by the clearly erroneous doctrine can not be successfully challenged here.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
387 F.2d 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-f-exum-jr-v-dampskibbelskabet-torm-as-dampskibbelskabet-ca5-1968.