Charles ex rel. Charles v. American Progressive Health Insurance

127 So. 2d 459, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2950
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 6, 1961
DocketNo. 60-376
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 127 So. 2d 459 (Charles ex rel. Charles v. American Progressive Health Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles ex rel. Charles v. American Progressive Health Insurance, 127 So. 2d 459, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

HORTON, Chief Judge.

The appellant seeks reversal of a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant in an action on a student insurance policy issued to the appellant’s minor son.

The appellant’s son, a member of a school varsity softball team, was involved in an accident while operating his motor scooter en route to the site of a softball game in which he was scheduled to participate. Due to insufficient automobile transportation, the coach of the softball team permitted several boys, including appellant’s son, to take their motor scooters to the game.

The point in issue here is whether the trial judge correctly interpreted the provisions of the insurance contract. The pertinent provisions are:

“(H) While engaged in practicing for or participating in any athletic contest excluding high school football, provided such practice or participation is under the supervision and direction of duly delegated school authorities.
“(I) While participating as a member of a covered athletic team, debating [460]*460team, glee club or band, riding as a group to or from a regular scheduled school activity in a vehicle selected by and operated under the supervision of duly delegated school authorities.”

We have reviewed the record, considered the briefs, and heard oral argument and conclude that the order appealed is without error and should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sovereign Life Insurance Co. v. Busse
401 S.W.2d 926 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Continental Casualty Company v. Borthwick
177 So. 2d 687 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 So. 2d 459, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-ex-rel-charles-v-american-progressive-health-insurance-fladistctapp-1961.