Charles Emma Small, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Yoretta Coleman v. Ronald Roberts and Adams Truck Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Charles Emma Small, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Yoretta Coleman v. Ronald Roberts and Adams Truck Lines, Inc.

DecidedMay 18, 2005

Docket12-05-00152-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Charles Emma Small, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Yoretta Coleman v. Ronald Roberts and Adams Truck Lines, Inc. (Charles Emma Small, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Yoretta Coleman v. Ronald Roberts and Adams Truck Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Emma Small, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Yoretta Coleman v. Ronald Roberts and Adams Truck Lines, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-05-00152-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CHARLES EMMA SMALL,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

THE ESTATE OF YORETTA COLEMAN,

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

RONALD ROBERTS AND

ADAMS TRUCK LINES, INC., § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEES

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court’s judgment was signed on December 16, 2004. Under rule of appellate procedure 26.1(a), unless Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial or other post judgment motion which extended the appellate deadlines, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed “within 30 days after the judgment [was] signed,” i.e., January 17, 2005. Although on March 17, 2005, Appellant filed a motion for new trial, because the motion was filed more than 30 days after judgment, the motion was untimely. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329(a). Consequently, the time for perfecting Appellant’s appeal was not extended. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 28, 2005. However, because the notice of appeal was not filed on or before January 17, 2005, this Court has no jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

On May 3, 2005, this Court notified Appellant pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a) that his notice of appeal was untimely. It also informed him that unless on or before May 13, 2005 the record was amended to establish the jurisdiction of this Court, the appeal would be dismissed. The deadline for responding to this Court’s notice has expired, and Appellant has not shown the jurisdiction of this Court.

Because this Court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered May 18, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-05-00152-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

CHARLES EMMA SMALL,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

THE ESTATE OF YORETTA COLEMAN,

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

RONALD ROBERTS AND

ADAMS TRUCK LINES, INC., § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

APPELLEES

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court’s judgment was signed on December 16, 2004. Under rule of appellate procedure 26.1(a), unless Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial or other post judgment motion which extended the appellate deadlines, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed “within 30 days after the judgment [was] signed,” i.e., January 17, 2005. Although on March 17, 2005, Appellant filed a motion for new trial, because the motion was filed more than 30 days after judgment, the motion was untimely. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329(a). Consequently, the time for perfecting Appellant’s appeal was not extended. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant filed a notice of appeal on April 28, 2005. However, because the notice of appeal was not filed on or before January 17, 2005, this Court has no jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

On May 3, 2005, this Court notified Appellant pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a) that his notice of appeal was untimely. It also informed him that unless on or before May 13, 2005 the record was amended to establish the jurisdiction of this Court, the appeal would be dismissed. The deadline for responding to this Court’s notice has expired, and Appellant has not shown the jurisdiction of this Court.

Because this Court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

Opinion delivered May 18, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Charles Emma Small, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Yoretta Coleman v. Ronald Roberts and Adams Truck Lines, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-emma-small-individually-and-as-the-persona-texapp-2005.