Charles Embry Jones v. The Budd Company

Fifth Circuit

Charles Embry Jones v. The Budd Company

358 F.2d 724, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6543

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1966

Docket22503

StatusPublished

This text of 358 F.2d 724 (Charles Embry Jones v. The Budd Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles Embry Jones v. The Budd Company, 358 F.2d 724, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6543 (5th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, in a diversity personal injury suit. A careful consideration of the record convinces us that the evidence submitted on the trial warranted the inferences drawn by the trial court, from which it concluded that the manufacturer of the equipment was not guilty of negligence in its construction or manufacture.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court, sitting without a jury, in a diversity personal injury suit. A careful consideration of the record convinces us that the evidence submitted on the trial warranted the inferences drawn by the trial court, from which it concluded that the manufacturer of the equipment was not guilty of negligence in its construction or manufacture.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 F.2d 724, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-embry-jones-v-the-budd-company-ca5-1966.