Charles Edwin Bennett v. J. O. Kearney, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Texarkana, Texas

227 F.2d 750, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3255
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 1955
Docket15654_1
StatusPublished

This text of 227 F.2d 750 (Charles Edwin Bennett v. J. O. Kearney, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Texarkana, Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Charles Edwin Bennett v. J. O. Kearney, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Texarkana, Texas, 227 F.2d 750, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3255 (5th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court dismissed the petition for habeas corpus assigning its reasons as follows;

“Since it conclusively appears that a motion to vacate sentence filed with the sentencing court, as pro *751 vided by Title 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2255, would be adequate to test the legality of petitioner’s detentions by the respondent Kearney, this court is without authority to entertain petitioner’s petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and, therefore, the motion of the respondent Kearney to dismiss will be sustained. Tacoma v. Hiatt [5 Cir.], 184 F.2d 569; Decatur v. Hiatt [5 Cir], 184 F.2d 719; and Neigut v. Kearney [5 Cir.], 221 F.2d 803.”

We agree. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tacoma v. Hiatt, Warden
184 F.2d 569 (Fifth Circuit, 1950)
Decatur v. Hiatt
184 F.2d 719 (Fifth Circuit, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 F.2d 750, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-edwin-bennett-v-j-o-kearney-warden-federal-correctional-ca5-1955.