Charles Edwards Sieloff III v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 2012·No. 05-12-01096-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered October , 2012

In The Qlourt of tppea1 fiftj itrtct of cxa at aUa No. 05-12-01096-CR

CHARLES EDWARDS SIELOFF III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-35795-P

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEx. R. App. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708

(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiarn). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which

may include appointment of new counsel. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/ -/ L DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Charles Edwards Sieloff III v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Charles Edwards Sieloff III v. State (Charles Edwards Sieloff III v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)